United States v. Ferrel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a violation of Rule 11(b)(1)(G) where the district court did not inform the defendant of any elements of his drug-distribution conspiracy charge and the quantity element was missing from the document referenced by the district court during the plea colloquy
• “[A] defendant who receives the information omitted by the district court from other sources generally cannot demonstrate that he would not have pleaded guilty had the court also so informed him.”
• “[A] defendant who receives the information omitted by the district court from other sources generally cannot demonstrate that he would not have pleaded guilty had the court also so informed him.”
• “[A] defendant who receives the information omitted by the district court from other sources generally cannot demonstrate that he would not have pleaded guilty had the court also so informed him.”
• “Mr. Ferrel consistently and repeatedly admitted prior to the Rule 11 hearing that his ... offense involved at least fifty grams of methamphetamine, and there is nothing in the record to suggest that he wanted a jury to determine that issue.”
• \The state is not a ' * * * citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof * * *' within the contemplation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 * * cf.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).