Skip to main content
· 12/21/1995

United States v. Ferlin Platero

Citations

  • 72 F.3d 806
  • 43 Fed. R. Serv. 245
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36141
  • 1995 WL 755141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a district court “proceeds to decide the preliminary relevancy-conditioned-on-fact issue against the proponent where the jury could reasonably find the fact to exist, the judge has violated the proponent’s right to a jury trial”
  • exclusion of evidence, in sex assault case, about alleged victim's romantic or sex-val relationship with third party violated defendant's confrontation rights
  • exclusion of evidence, in sex assault case, about alleged victim's romantic or sexual relationship with third party violated defendant's confrontation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ebel, Holloway, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.