· 12/21/1995
United States v. Ferlin Platero
Citations
- 72 F.3d 806
- 43 Fed. R. Serv. 245
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 36141
- 1995 WL 755141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that when a district court “proceeds to decide the preliminary relevancy-conditioned-on-fact issue against the proponent where the jury could reasonably find the fact to exist, the judge has violated the proponent’s right to a jury trial”
- exclusion of evidence, in sex assault case, about alleged victim's romantic or sex-val relationship with third party violated defendant's confrontation rights
- exclusion of evidence, in sex assault case, about alleged victim's romantic or sexual relationship with third party violated defendant's confrontation rights
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ebel, Holloway, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.