Skip to main content
· 8/29/1995

United States v. Ferenc Koreh

Citations

  • 59 F.3d 431
  • 1995 WL 395074

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that proof of \advocacy and assistance in persecution” would render the defendant \ineligible for a DPA visa under both section 2(b) and section 13 of the DPA.”
  • indicating in dictum that although personal participation need not be proven, willing membership was still required
  • declining to decide the availability of laches as a defense against the Government in a denaturalization action because defendant had failed to demonstrate specific prejudice as a result of Government’s alleged lack of diligence
  • “There need be no personal participation by the defendant in the commission of physical atrocities.”
  • involvement in the publication of anti-Semitic articles constituted assistance in persecution of .Hungarian Jews
  • describing diligence as the standard for undue delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Nygaard, Mekee, Becker, Stapleton, Mansmann, Greenberg, Hutchinson, Scirica, Cowen, Alito, Roth, Lewis, McKee, Sarokin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.