United States v. Feras Rahman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining forfeiture when “the argu- ment was available to [the defendant] at the time of the No. 20-3297 17 search”
• remanding, in part, because judge's erroneous factual finding as to a defendant's role in offense was \important\ to sentencing judge, even though judge pointed to other evidence supporting decision
• remanding, in part, because judge’s erroneous factual finding as to a defendant’s No. 17-3514 11 role in offense was “important” to sentencing judge, even though judge pointed to other evidence supporting decision
• remanding, in part, because judge’s erroneous factual finding as to a defendant’s No. 17-3514 11 role in offense was “important” to sentencing judge, even though judge pointed to other evidence supporting decision
• “Because a person may voluntarily waive his Fourth Amendment rights, no warrant is required where the defendant consents to a search.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).