United States v. Felipe Zepeda-Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Apprendi error was harmless because overwhelming and uncontroverted evidence showed that the defendant was removed after his conviction
• holding that Apprendi violations are subject to harmless error review
• holding, where the defendant pled guilty to the offense, that Apprendi error was harmless in light of the evidence in the “whole record” that the government “would have introduced at trial had the issue been properly presented” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• making reference to the defendant’s failure to contest the date of his removal at sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).