Skip to main content
· 2/2/2006

United States v. Fei Ye, AKA Ye Fei Ming Zhong, AKA Zhong Ming AKA Andy Zhong

Citations

  • 436 F.3d 1117
  • 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1942
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2562
  • 2006 WL 240685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that there is no reason for further investigation of clear and unambiguous statutory language “unless its application leads to unreasonable or impracticable results.”
  • stating that discovery orders are generally interlocutory and nonappealable
  • granting government’s petition for a writ of mandamus in part in light of the fact that the error would not be reviewable on appeal because if the defendants were acquitted double jeopardy would bar the appeal, and if they were convicted there would be no prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noonan, Tashima, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.