· 2/2/2006
United States v. Fei Ye, AKA Ye Fei Ming Zhong, AKA Zhong Ming AKA Andy Zhong
Citations
- 436 F.3d 1117
- 77 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1942
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2562
- 2006 WL 240685
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that there is no reason for further investigation of clear and unambiguous statutory language “unless its application leads to unreasonable or impracticable results.”
- stating that discovery orders are generally interlocutory and nonappealable
- granting government’s petition for a writ of mandamus in part in light of the fact that the error would not be reviewable on appeal because if the defendants were acquitted double jeopardy would bar the appeal, and if they were convicted there would be no prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Tashima, Fletcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.