United States v. Federico Giovanelli A/K/A Fritzy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court had jurisdiction to hear claimant’s Rule 41(e) motion for the return of property despite its being brought in a different district than that in which the property was seized

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).