United States v. Farrow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying enhancement based on combination of bank teller’s observations and defendant’s threatening actions
• amendment was clarifying because, among other things, it did not “compel this court to overrule existing circuit precedent”
• “[T]he plain language of the commentary to USSG §§ 2B3.1 and 1B1.1 necessarily requires some ‘object’ to support a finding of possession of a dangerous weapon.”
• interpreting “the plain language of the commentary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).