United States v. Fabian A. Espinosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the existence of a gun in plain view at a passenger’s feet is sufficient evidence that the driver was knowingly carrying the firearm for the purpose of protecting a drug transaction
• recognizing that “[t]he standard for granting a motion for new trial is somewhat less exacting [when compared to a motion for acquittal] because the evidence need not be viewed in the light most favorable to the government”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).