United States v. F. A. Marsily & Co.
Citations
- 165 F. 186
- 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 4744
Syllabus
<p>1. Customs Duties (§ 38*) — Products from Petroleum Originating Abroad-Following the Decisions op the Circuit Courts op Appeals in Other Circuits.</p> <p>Iu accordance with tbe practice in the First Circuit, the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second. Circuit in United States v. R. F. Downing & Co., 146 Fed. 56, 76 C. O. A. 376, with reference to Tariff Act July 21, 1807, c. 11, § 2, J-Yoo Dint, par. «26, JO Slat. 190 (TJ. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685), as applied to the products of petroleum, followed.</p> <p>LEd. Note. — For other cases, see Customs Duties, Dec. Dig. § 38.*]</p> <p>2. Courts (§ 96*) — Cojijty—Concurrence with Courts of Take Status.</p> <p>This Circuit Court of Appeals will ordinarily concur in the decisions of Circuit Courts of Appeals in other circuits.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.' — 'For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. § 327; Dec. Dig. § 90.* i</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that in order for a holder of convertible bonds to bring derivative suit, such bonds must be convertible into equity of the entity being derivatively sued by the bondholder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldrich, Colt, Putnam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.