United States v. Extreme Associates, Inc. Robert Zicari, AKA Rob Black Janet Romano, AKA Lizzie Borden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vendor of obscene materials had standing to challenge a federal obscenity statute on behalf of its customers
• stressing, at length, that the Third Circuit cannot ignore a Su- preme Court case directly on point unless that case has been completely abrogated
• reaffirming strict adherence to the principle that a lower court should leave to a higher court “the prerogative of overruling its own decisions”
• stressing, at length, that the Third Circuit cannot ignore a Supreme Court case directly on point unless that case has been completely abrogated
• reaffirming strict adherence to the principle that a lower court should leave to a higher court “the prerogative of overruling its own decisions” (quoting Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203, 237 (1997)
• rejecting the argument that Paris Adult Theatre I, Orito, and Reidel dealt only with a First, and not a Fourteenth, Amendment concept of privacy merely because the phrase “substantive due process” was not used in their holdings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).