Seventh Circuit· 9/9/1983
United States v. Everett Ray Darnell
Citations
- 716 F.2d 479
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 24120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a flexible, equitable time limitation based on the doctrine of lach-es” is applicable to petitions for coram nobis relief
- the abuse-of-the-writ doctrine does not apply to coram nobis petitions, because the narrow scope of the writ \ensures that coram nobis will not be utilized as a substitute for appeal\
- \The government's ability to meet successfully the allegations of the motion or to present a case against the defendant if he is granted a new trial may be greatly diminished by the passage of time.\ (footnote omitted)
- \The government's ability to meet successfully the allegations of the motion or to present a case against the defendant if he is granted a new trial may be greatly diminished by the passage of time.\ (footnote omitted)
- writ of error coram nobis
- five year delay is unreasonable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Pell, Bauer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Paul J. Foont v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1996-08-22· cited 126×
- United States v. DyerFifth Circuit· 1998-02-27· cited 98×
- Piper Aircraft Corporation v. Wag-Aero, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1984-08-03· cited 97×
- Telink, Inc. Burnup & Sims, Inc. v. United States of America, County of Fresno, County of San Diego, Intervenors-AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1994-05-13· cited 96×
- Ramsey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-19· cited 68×
- Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Anne M. Gorsuch, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection AgencySeventh Circuit· 1984-08-22· cited 40×
- United States v. HallahanSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-07· cited 34×
- Johnson v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-06-01· cited 33×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-21· cited 29×
- United States v. Mora-GomezE.D. Virginia· 1995-02-15· cited 28×
- United States v. Chester FolakSeventh Circuit· 1988-12-19· cited 22×
- McMannis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-02-08· cited 21×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-12-07· cited 20×
- Patrick R. Rizzo v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1987-06-02· cited 14×
- United States v. MilesTenth Circuit· 2019-05-03· cited 13×
- Moguel v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-06· cited 10×
- Commonwealth v. DuestMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1988-06-27· cited 9×
- State v. ScalesIndiana Supreme Court· 1992-06-02· cited 7×
- United States v. Janet HallahanSeventh Circuit· 2014-03-07· cited 7×
- United States v. HawkinsS.D. Illinois· 1997-03-25· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 1,436×
- Charles N. Norris v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1982-08-13· cited 169×
- United States v. WashingtonThird Circuit· 1965-02-12· cited 78×
- United States v. MooreSeventh Circuit· 1948-02-27· cited 35×
- United States v. Estanislao Correa-De JesusSeventh Circuit· 1983-06-02· cited 32×
- United States v. David T. DellingerSeventh Circuit· 1981-08-19· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.