United States v. Everett Denoyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a statement was admissible under Fed. R. Evid. 803(4) and 803(24
• reasoning that the identity of the abuser is pertinent to treatment because “[t]he exact nature and extent of the psychological problems which ensue from child abuse often depend on the identity of the abuser” (quotation omitted)
• characterizing \consistent with” as \the customary cautious professional jargon of the medical profession for what lawyers would speak of as causation”
• characterizing “consistent with” as “the customary cautious professional jargon of the medical profession for what lawyers would speak of as causation”
• applying the medical treatment exception to comments made to social workers
• evidence to prove other deviate sex offenders were operating in the community was properly excluded as too remote and speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).