United States v. Evaristo Rangel-Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant met his burden to show prejudice through an affidavit stating that he would have contacted his consulate had he been made aware of his right to do so
• INS affidavit insufficient because it fails to include any factors which “might have been” developed as a result of consultation with consular officials
• INS affidavit insufficient because it fails to include any factors which \might have been\ developed as a result of consultation with consular officials
• that very few aliens, when advised of right to consult with Consulate, do so, has no bearing on what a particular individual would have done
• “deportations are subject to collateral attack”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).