N.D. Illinois· 8/29/2012
United States v. Evans
Citations
- 892 F. Supp. 2d 949
- 2012 WL 3779302
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123652
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that use of Google Maps to plot cell tower locations “does not require scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge and that these exhibits are admissible through lay opinion testimony under Rule 701”
- agreeing that plotting locations on maps does not require specialized knowledge and admitting the maps under Rule 701
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lefkow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- v. ShanksColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-10-24· cited 690×
- United States v. Wayne HillSeventh Circuit· 2016-03-21· cited 96×
- United States v. JonesDistrict of Columbia· 2013-01-23· cited 51×
- Patricia Jackson v. Allstate Insurance CompanyEighth Circuit· 2015-05-07· cited 48×
- United States v. Aaron GrahamFourth Circuit· 2015-08-05· cited 47×
- State v. Payne & BondCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-11· cited 37×
- Jairus Collins v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court· 2015-08-20· cited 30×
- State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-28· cited 30×
- United States v. Marchado-ErazoDistrict of Columbia· 2013-06-17· cited 28×
- State v. PattonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2013-10-08· cited 26×
- Runyon v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 2017-01-19· cited 25×
- State v. DanielOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-04· cited 22×
- People v. FountainAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-17· cited 21×
- State of West Virginia v. Tulsa JohnsonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 20×
- People v. GarlingerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-06-01· cited 16×
- United States v. Mustafa Deville ReynoldsSixth Circuit· 2023-11-09· cited 16×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-08-28· cited 10×
- State v. GilesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-20· cited 5×
- United States v. PembrookE.D. Michigan· 2015-07-31· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-05· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- Gayton v. McCoySeventh Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 786×
- Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadSeventh Circuit· 2010-12-15· cited 235×
- Richard Walker v. Soo Line Railroad CompanySeventh Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 200×
- Bielskis v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2011-11-18· cited 125×
- United States v. Bill S. Conn, Sr.Seventh Circuit· 2002-08-21· cited 119×
- United States v. Cornelius Peoples, United States of America v. Xavier LightfootEighth Circuit· 2001-05-18· cited 110×
- Tampa Bay Shipbuilding & Repair Co. v. Cedar Shipping Co.Eleventh Circuit· 2003-02-05· cited 106×
- Vanessa G. Chapman, as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Kyle E. Chapman, Jr., Deceased v. Maytag CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2002-07-29· cited 88×
- United States v. ChristianSeventh Circuit· 2012-03-12· cited 83×
- United States v. Abdul Raimi MamahSeventh Circuit· 2003-06-11· cited 54×
- United States v. GrahamD. Maryland· 2012-03-01· cited 37×
- Compania Administradora De Recuperacion De Activos Administradora De Fondos De Inversion Sociedad Anonima v. Titan International, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2008-07-10· cited 29×
- United States v. FelicianoEleventh Circuit· 2008-11-25· cited 16×
- Traharne v. Wayne Scott Fetzer Co.N.D. Illinois· 2001-06-11· cited 7×
- Chen v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2004-08-13· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.