United States v. Eugene Sherbak, United States of America v. John Douglas Salih

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that FED. R. CRIM. P. 32 “does not require a catechismic regurgitation of each fact determined and each fact rejected when they are determinable from a PSR that the court has adopted by reference”
• vacating and remanding for specific findings as to amount of drugs attributable to defendant
• \[I]ssues raised for the first time on appeal `are not reviewable by this [c]ourt unless they involve purely legal questions and failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).