United States v. Eugene A. Nolan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that issues raised in a § 2255 motion that were already decided on direct appeal will generally not be reconsidered
• noting that “[a]n issue disposed of on direct appeal will ... not be reconsidered on a collateral attack by a [2255] motion [absent] an intervening change in the law of a circuit”
• applying the “dictionary meaning of the word ‘record’ [] as that which is written or transcribed to perpetuate knowledge or events,” since the FOIA failed to define the term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).