United States v. Eteuati Paopao

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a suppression motion based on an “officer’s entry” and “protective sweep” of a location where the defendant lacked a “reasonable expectation of privacy”
• police officer’s presence in an apartment after an arrest was legal as part of a protective sweep because the officer was not yet “secure in the notion that no one was left in the apartment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).