United States v. Etchon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \entitlement to active duty back pay and retirement pay arise under different sections of the Code\
• stating that the \plaintiff s pyramid ofpresumptions\ in that case w€re \based upon voiding [his] discharge\
• stating that post-discharge proceedings before administrative review boards are “permissive in nature and do not serve to toll the running of the statute of limitations.”
• finding that the plaintiff s \back pay claim and . . . retirement claim are not severable under the facts of this case even though they arise under different sections of the Code and accrue as the result of different events\
• claim for active duty pay on ground of illegal discharge from military service accrues upon the member’s discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).