United States v. Esterman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the scheme “did not have any cognizable impact” on the financial institution, which “was called upon to do nothing more than to honor the authorizations that were wholly regular from the bank’s perspective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).