Skip to main content
· 2/26/1990

United States v. Estelle Rogers

Citations

  • 897 F.2d 134
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 2622
  • 1990 WL 16376

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[i]n some cases, the particular guideline at issue may suggest circumstances or factors that, if present, may provide the basis for departure.”
  • \[T]he district court is to consider the guidelines and policy statements of the Commission that are in effect on the date the offender is sentenced.\
  • district court erred when it refused to consider concurrent sentence despite its general authority to depart from guidelines and case remanded
  • conflict between § 3584(a) and section 5G1.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Wilkinson, Fox, Eastern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.