United States v. Espinoza-Baza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no jury instruction required when “the trial record contains nothing more than a mere scintilla of evidence of derivative citizenship”
• giving substantial deference to the district court’s Rule 403 rulings, “unless it ‘lies beyond the pale of reasonable justification under the circumstances’” (quoting United States v. Pineda-Doval, 614 F.3d 1019, 1035 (9th Cir. 2010))
• “district court has discretion to exclude 2 even relevant evidence” under Rule 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).