· 8/17/2017
United States v. Espinosa-Nava
Citations
- 695 F. App'x 790
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying intrusion upon seclusion claim involving allegation that the plaintiff’s supervisor accessed postings on her Facebook “wall” that could be viewed only by her Facebook friends
- expectation of privacy in Facebook comments only where plaintiff restricted access thereto
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clement, Costa, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.