Skip to main content
· 8/17/2017

United States v. Espinosa-Nava

Citations

  • 695 F. App'x 790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying intrusion upon seclusion claim involving allegation that the plaintiff’s supervisor accessed postings on her Facebook “wall” that could be viewed only by her Facebook friends
  • expectation of privacy in Facebook comments only where plaintiff restricted access thereto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clement, Costa, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.