Skip to main content
· 6/16/2015

United States v. Espericueta

Citations

  • 607 F. App'x 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “My disposition of the Mills claim and the conclusion that a writ of habeas corpus is issued with respect to Steele’s capital sentence renders it unnecessary to address his remaining sentencing-phase claims; any relief he could obtain on those claims would be cumulative.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Higginson, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.