United States v. Esparza-Ponce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because a violation of the Convention does not equate to a Miranda violation, applying the “presumption of prejudice mandated by Miranda” is inappropriate
• concluding that defendant's Vienna Convention claim was not entitled to Miranda presumption of prejudice
• reaching merits of Vienna Convention claim after noting that \several courts have allowed individual claims of violations of the Convention to proceed\
• refusing to equate a violation of Article 36 to a Miranda violation
• “[A] violation of the Convention does not rise to the level of a Miranda violation. Applying the presumption of prejudice mandated by Miranda is therefore inappropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).