United States v. Esly Pereira-Salmeron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writing that “there is no indication that the term [‘crime of violence’] is intended to mean something different for [one] provision than it does elsewhere”
• noting that “the word ‘includes’ .... inherently weighs against the notion that subpart (II
• noting that “extortionate exten- sion of credit and burglary” do not entail use of force but do involve risk that force may be used during their commission
• noting that “[u]nder the interpretation urged by [the defendant],[burglary of a dwelling and extortionate extension of credit] could not qualify as crimes of violence ... [b]ut the explicit inclusion of those crimes within subpart (II
• noting that even burglary of a dwelling, which is specifically listed as a crime of violence under the guidelines, does not categorically have as an element any touching or physical harm to the person of another
• noting, after discussing in dicta the results reached under the catchall provision of another guideline, that “[t]he specific issue before us is whether Pereira-Salmeron’s conviction ... falls within the category of ‘sexual abuse of a minor,’ ” a per se category

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).