Sixth Circuit· 9/28/1990

United States v. Erwin R. Wunder

Citations

919 F.2d 34
67 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 552
1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17346
1990 WL 175028

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that where “the record is adequate to assess the merits of the defendant’s allegations, some courts will consider them”
explaining that where “the record is adequate to assess the merits of the defendant’s allegations, some courts will consider them”
rejecting claim of a PRA violation and affirming conviction for failing to file a return
\Defendant was not convicted of violating a regulation but of violating a statute which required him to file an income tax return.\
Regulations do not need OMB control number because the requirement to file a tax return is mandated by statute and not by regulation; the PRA does not apply to the statutory requirement, but only to the forms themselves, which contained the appropriate numbers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy, Guy, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

99 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.