United States v. Ernie Dimitric Caro, A/K/A Louis Caro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s delivery of large quantities of drugs provides circumstantial evidence that he was a co-conspirator and not merely a customer of the conspiracy
• “Ordinarily, a statement that identifies the role of one co-conspirator to another is in furtherance of the conspiracy.”
• “[A] defendant’s participation in the conspiracy may be slight and may be inferred from the defendant’s actions so long as the evidence establishes a connection to the conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).