United States v. Ernesto Lopes Salsedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that criminal defendant's counsel waived work product privilege by referencing the privileged document during cross examination
• particulars of witness’s previous work for Drug Enforcement Administration were cumulative where the jury had sufficient other evidence of the witness’s potential bias
• informant's compensation from DEA, including previous occasions, allowed by trial court, which also ordered production of DEA pay guidelines so defense counsel could use them in cross-examination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).