United States v. Ernesto Becerril-Pena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding district court did not commit procedural error by failing to specifically address defendant’s mitigating arguments
• noting that a defendant’s criminal history is par- ticularly relevant to the substantial-rights inquiry
• noting Section 5D1.1’s commentary “makes clear . . . supervised release remains especially appropriate for defendants with lengthy criminal histories”
• affirming term of supervised release despite § 5D1.1(c)’s recommendation because of defendant’s criminal history
• “This section does not evince an intent to confer a benefit upon deportable aliens that is not available to other defendants.”
• “To the extent Becerril makes a more expansive [Guideline] § 5D1.1 objection on appeal, we would normally review for plain error.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).