United States v. Ernest Schmeltzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the fact that a state proceeding is ongoing would 21 necessarily mean interference by a federal court
• “The changed circumstances—the convictions for four different charges and the increased offense level—are sufficient objective events and information justifying an increase so as to rebut any presumption of vindictiveness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).