United States v. Ernest Paul La Monica

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no Miranda violation because the “officer who asked [defendant] about the receipt was not seeking evidence but was trying to identify and inventory [defendant’s] personal effects”
• admitted response to question where \suspect was (not) interrogated for the purpose of eliciting an incriminating statement\ and the officer \was not seeking evidence.\
• admitted response to question where “suspect was [not] interrogated for the purpose of eliciting an incriminating statement” and the officer “was not seeking evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).