Skip to main content
· 10/16/1984

United States v. Ernest Mendel and Albert Mendel & Son, Incorporated

Citations

  • 746 F.2d 155
  • 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ultimate question is whether the authentication testimony is sufficiently complete so as to convince the court of the improbability that original item had been exchanged with another or otherwise tampered with

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Pierce, Markey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.