· 10/16/1984
United States v. Ernest Mendel and Albert Mendel & Son, Incorporated
Citations
- 746 F.2d 155
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17649
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ultimate question is whether the authentication testimony is sufficiently complete so as to convince the court of the improbability that original item had been exchanged with another or otherwise tampered with
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Pierce, Markey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.