United States v. Ernest McDowell, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Almendarez-Torres remains good law [even after Alleyne], and we may not disregard it unless and until the Supreme Court holds to the contrary”
• explaining that the jury right doesn’t attach to the Armed Career Criminal Act, which is an enhancement
• affording “considerable deference to a district court’s determinations regarding the reliability of information in a PSR”
• “Almendarez-Torres remains good law, and we may not disregard it unless and until the Supreme Court holds to the contrary.”
• “The pervasive use of NCIC reports throughout the criminal justice system further indicates that such reports may be trusted.”
• “[W]e may not disregard [Supreme Court precedent] unless and until the Supreme Court holds to the contrary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).