Skip to main content
· 5/26/1993

United States v. Ernest Lee Jennings

Citations

  • 991 F.2d 725
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 12318
  • 1993 WL 148949

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that having the victim’s friend on the grand jury did not substantially influence the decision to indict because the prosecution presented overwhelming evidence of probable cause
  • explaining that § 1B1.3 relevant conduct “includes evidence of the defendant’s conduct relating to counts on which the defendant was indicted but acquitted at trial” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Dubina, Godbold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.