United States v. Ernest L. Brunskill and Evelyn B. Brunskill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that residential struc- tures on a mining claim were “significant surface disturbances within the scope of 36 C.F.R. Part 228” such that the mining operation required an approved plan of operations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).