United States v. Ernest Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that although video did not have audio, it was sufficient to establish factual predicate for sentencing enhancement under clear error standard
• “[S]ubstance abuse problems, without more, do not necessarily justify a downward variance under the Guidelines”
• “The district court [is] in a unique position to assess [a defendant’s] sincerity and we are especially deferential to its assessment of whether the defendant accepted responsibility.” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).