United States v. Ernest Edward Dominguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparable federal rule of criminal procedure may be used “whenever the judge becomes convinced that the juror’s abilities to perform his duties become impaired”
• inadvertent ex-cusal of juror out of defendant’s presence did not violate right to presence
• inadvertent excusal of juror out of defendant's presence did not violate right to presence
• “it is within the trial judge’s sound discretion to remove a juror whenever the judge becomes convinced that the juror’s abilities to perform his duties become impaired”
• “It is settled law in this and other circuits that it is within the trial judge’s sound discretion to remove a juror whenever the judge becomes convinced that the juror’s abilities to perform his duties become impaired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).