Skip to main content
· 7/30/1996

United States v. Ernest D. Preate, Jr. Pg Publishing

Citations

  • 91 F.3d 10
  • 24 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2242
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18897
  • 1996 WL 422877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “[ojur earlier cases ... have stressed that pretrial or trial motions for closure be docketed in order to allow interested members of the public to protest such closure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Mansmann, Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.