Skip to main content
· 11/2/2005

United States v. Ernest A. Newsom

Citations

  • 428 F.3d 685
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23641
  • 2005 WL 2861576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The question is not how we ourselves would have resolved the factors identified as relevant by section 3553(a).”
  • “[O]ne needs to know more than the crime of conviction and the total length of the sentence to evaluate disparities; the specific facts of the crimes and the defendant’s individual characteristics are also pertinent.”
  • “[O]ne needs to know more than the crime of conviction and the total length of the sentence to evaluate disparities; the specific facts of the crimes and the defendant’s individual characteristics are also pertinent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Posner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.