United States v. Erika, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing unambiguous statements to that effect in Senate and Conference Reports, as well as statements in the Congressional Record
• upholding as consistent with the statute the preclusion of judicial review after a determination of benefits payable under Part B
• only review of eligibility issues under Part B of Medicare Act is provided by § 1395ff
• “precisely drawn provisions [of Medicare Part B] ... provides persuasive evidence that congress deliberately intended to foreclose further review of such claims.”
• “in the context of the [Medicare] statute’s precisely drawn provisions, this omission [of a provision for judicial review of certain claims regarding medicare payments] provides persuasive evidence that Congress deliberately intended to foreclose further review of such claims”
• determination of right to Medicare Part B payments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).