Skip to main content
· 8/5/1992

United States v. Erik Darnell Stewart

Citations

  • 972 F.2d 216
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17875
  • 1992 WL 183909

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a Fourth Amendment suppression challenge is a “nonjurisdictional” claim
  • declining to consider the denial of a suppression motion where the defendant entered a guilty plea

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wollman, Bright, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.