United States v. Erick Arias Campos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the “interest of justice” requirement of Rule 33(a) to require a showing of a “miscarriage of justice”
• interpreting the “interest of justice” requirement for a new trial under Rule 33(a) to mean that a “miscarriage of justice” would otherwise occur
• interpreting the “interest of justice” requirement of Rule 33(a) to require a showing of a “miscarriage of justice”
• interpreting the “interest of justice” requirement for a new trial under Rule 33(a) to require a showing that a “miscarriage of justice” will occur absent relief
• granting of new trial under Rule 33 is remedy to be used only “sparingly and with caution”
• reversing new- trial grant because the district court discounted circumstantial evidence of intent to distribute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).