Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Eighth Circuit· 11/26/2019

United States v. Eric Williams

Citations

  • 943 F.3d 841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a similarly worded provision in the First Step Act does not require a hearing
  • holding that the First Step Act does not require a hearing
  • concluding that the district court “did not abuse its discretion by considering the [defendant’s] rehabilitation, but not adjusting the sentence” under the First Step Act in part because of the defendant’s criminal history
  • holding that district courts need not hold hearings on these motions
  • holding that the First Step Act does not require a hearing
  • explaining that the sentencing court must have considered the parties’ arguments and have a reasoned basis for its decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Eric Williams

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.