United States v. Eric F. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting a defendant's due process claim based upon the erasure of a potentially exculpatory videotape in the absence of showing bad faith
• accepting a similar legal argument under South Carolina law in a case involving markedly different facts
• defendant's due process rights were not violated when videotape of bank robbery was inadvertently erased
• \Sander's [sic] trial followed and two tellers identified Sanders as the robber.\
• inadvertent erasing of videotape does not constitute bad faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).