United States v. Eric Agramonte

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting defendant’s argument that the trial court erred in dismissing a juror because “[the defendant] ma[de] no assertion[ ] that he suffered bias or prejudice and d[id] not claim the alternate juror ... was not impartial”
• finding the removal of an empaneled juror to be harmless where the appellant “makes no assertions that he suffered bias or prejudice, and does not claim that the alternate juror who completed the trial was not impartial”
• although court dismissed juror during trial and appointed alternate without holding requisite inquiry, reversible error cannot be found absent assertion that “the alternate juror who completed the trial was not impartial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).