Skip to main content
· 1/7/2011

United States v. Erazo

Citations

  • 628 F.3d 608
  • 393 U.S. App. D.C. 380
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 397
  • 2011 WL 44488

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that we review factual findings underlying a decision to apply a sentencing enhancement for clear error, and give due deference to the district court’s application of the Guidelines to the facts
  • holding that we review factual findings underlying a decision to apply a sentencing enhancement for clear error, and 17 PUBLIC COPY – SEALED INFORMATION DELETED give due deference to the district court’s application of the Guidelines to the facts
  • “[T]he requisite connection with the underlying offense is established if the weapon was used or carried in order to protect contraband.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henderson, Williams, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.