Skip to main content
· 9/13/1862

United States v. Enwright

Citations

  • 25 F. Cas. 1015
  • 1862 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]ll documents filed by counsel on behalf of SMC, i.e., its answer, motion to transfer, and proposed order, are null and void.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.