United States v. Enrique L. Orozco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[M]ere conjecture or supposition about the possible relevancy of the informant’s testimony is insufficient to warrant disclosure.” (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Gonzales, 606 F.2d 70, 75 (5th Cir. 1979))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).