United States v. Enova Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the “Tunney Act expressly allows the court to make its public interest determination on the basis of the competitive impact statement and response to comments alone”
• “It is plainly not for the Court to second-guess the government’s predictions concerning the impact of the merger or the proposed remedies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).